• CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Classic fluff piece to make China look more innovative than they actually are. I wouldn‘t be surprised if we never heard of this tech or if they recycle the same article next year. Tech ‚journalism‘ about China is a mine field of false claims and exaggerations.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      These batteries are already in production cars. Have been for a while. If you don’t have access to them it’s because of your regressive protectionist government.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No no no. China is Fake News. They don’t even make cars. If they made cars, I would have seen Chinese cars driving around in America.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Regressive protectionism isn’t exactly unique to the American auto industry but yea.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Na+ batteries are really cool tech, and with a few more iterations of R&D they can potentially replace Li+ batteries, removing the need for rare earth elements that are toxic to people and the environment, dangerous to extract, and more often than not extracted by child slave labor (such as in Xinjiang and Congo).

      It doesn’t matter how you feel about China, although framing Na+ as “China’s battery” is problematic for other reasons.

        • Boost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          My understanding is that the lithium itself isn’t the issue, it’s that lithium batteries require other rare earths like cobalt where as sodium itself is not only more common than lithium, but it uses more common material like iron or tin in its battery chemistry that are also less problematic.

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This is recycled I read about about this last year in the same kind of context on Reddit.

      Separately though I have read there are hundreds of chemical combinations that produce electricity and only a handful have been researched for batteries.