• folaht@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    So glad to see this.
    Seeing all those nuclear fanboy comments whenever solar was mentioned from 2010 to 2025 was tiring.
    Onto the natgas fanboys.

    I’m looking at you Alex Christoforou.

      • folaht@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Include battery-exhausted to windless and I agree,
        but natgas fanboys will still claim that solar power “doesn’t work” and “can’t ever replace natgas”.

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Why? Why do people constantly claim that the only way to generate baseline power is by releasing fossil fuels and burning things?

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          No. Not baseline. Standby capacity for when it’s cloudy, still, dry and all battery capacity has been used up.

          Maybe we only need natural gas for, say, 10 hours per year, but in those hours we really need it