☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 days agoSolar is winning the energy racewww.dw.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up188arrow-down12
arrow-up186arrow-down1external-linkSolar is winning the energy racewww.dw.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoI still want natgas for cold, windless winter weeks.
minus-squarefolaht@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-21 day agoInclude battery-exhausted to windless and I agree, but natgas fanboys will still claim that solar power “doesn’t work” and “can’t ever replace natgas”.
minus-squarePowerCrazy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoWhy? Why do people constantly claim that the only way to generate baseline power is by releasing fossil fuels and burning things?
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 day agoNo. Not baseline. Standby capacity for when it’s cloudy, still, dry and all battery capacity has been used up. Maybe we only need natural gas for, say, 10 hours per year, but in those hours we really need it
I still want natgas for cold, windless winter weeks.
Include battery-exhausted to windless and I agree,
but natgas fanboys will still claim that solar power “doesn’t work” and “can’t ever replace natgas”.
Why? Why do people constantly claim that the only way to generate baseline power is by releasing fossil fuels and burning things?
No. Not baseline. Standby capacity for when it’s cloudy, still, dry and all battery capacity has been used up.
Maybe we only need natural gas for, say, 10 hours per year, but in those hours we really need it