ig the idea is that California has 40m people, but none of them are both 18 and women? Idk why violet’s demographic is relevant at all, let alone important enough to think she’s lying about 😂
It’s because of the fact that violet makes all of violet’s posts about violet. Naturally people are going to want to know more about violet, but then violet responds that anyone who wants to know about violet is deranged.
They represent themselves as basically a typical woman as written by a male sci-fi author, and then they aggressive towards anyone who questions it. They make their content about themselves, but they act offended if anyone comments about them. It’s not the random commenters who are trying to make everything about the OP, they are just falling for the bait.
Look at me, I am woman, I have BOOBS, I like big sex and getting pounded, I am woman, I am an OBJECT. Not all women have personality. I am real woman with woman private parts. This is my entire persona. You don’t beleive me? You are fuuuuucked up.
Looking at her posts on the new account, she’s clearly playing as a young and hot woman who is “based” and uses raunchy humor to appeal to the crowds here. All 3 of the posts have this same perspective so far.
Granted I didn’t catch a lot of her original account’s postings, just saw it here and there, but she is clearly posting from her point of view.
Ehh yes and no. A lot of users here are posting like news articles, comic strips, and the like that usually center around the news topic or political topic.
Violet’s posts (so far) are strictly from the perspective of funny hot girl making commentary on the internet.
I don’t care that she’s horny - as I said, I wasn’t critiquing her. Her posts have a very particular flavor, so to speak, and it does revolve around her personality first and foremost. You immediately know what type of person that user is trying to portray when you look at the user history.
ig the idea is that California has 40m people, but none of them are both 18 and women? Idk why violet’s demographic is relevant at all, let alone important enough to think she’s lying about 😂
It’s because of the fact that violet makes all of violet’s posts about violet. Naturally people are going to want to know more about violet, but then violet responds that anyone who wants to know about violet is deranged.
They represent themselves as basically a typical woman as written by a male sci-fi author, and then they aggressive towards anyone who questions it. They make their content about themselves, but they act offended if anyone comments about them. It’s not the random commenters who are trying to make everything about the OP, they are just falling for the bait.
I guess she does come off as a woman from a Heinlein book.
Oh, so she’s the internet version of a pick me.
I couldn’t put my finger on why I was side-eyeing all of that this morning, but you explained it perfectly in this comment.
Violet does sound like a roleplay of some kind. But it’s a very well thought-out identity. Quite consistent. I wonder if any part of it is true
The wanting to be accepted and adored by the men on Lemmy is probably true.
No… she doesn’t…?
Looking at her posts on the new account, she’s clearly playing as a young and hot woman who is “based” and uses raunchy humor to appeal to the crowds here. All 3 of the posts have this same perspective so far.
Granted I didn’t catch a lot of her original account’s postings, just saw it here and there, but she is clearly posting from her point of view.
Everyone posts from their point of view. I’m doing it right now.
Ehh yes and no. A lot of users here are posting like news articles, comic strips, and the like that usually center around the news topic or political topic.
Violet’s posts (so far) are strictly from the perspective of funny hot girl making commentary on the internet.
This isn’t a critique, just an observation.
Posting a news article is foundationally tied to which articles you’ve seen and which you find interesting.
It’s really besides the point, though. Violet being horny is no more notable than me being very loudly anti AI.
I don’t care that she’s horny - as I said, I wasn’t critiquing her. Her posts have a very particular flavor, so to speak, and it does revolve around her personality first and foremost. You immediately know what type of person that user is trying to portray when you look at the user history.
What kind of person would that be?
I’m not asking as a personal attack, by the way; I am aware you don’t care that she’s horny.
It’s not, I think people just get caught up in the narratives we make.