Once again associating sexual submissiveness with immorality and stupidity. Y’all really just can’t say they’re bad people for who they are for some reason, it’s always about reaffirming attacks on other groups. It’s misogynistic, it’s queerphobic, it’s ableist, and it says so little about what the actual problem is. It actually diverts attention away from the actual problem which is people with a material interest in subscribing to this system and its violence.
Responses to this comment made me realize there is a substantial number of mansplainers who only know the word “submissive” from porn. Jfc you gooners gotta shut up.
In this case we mean it more like childlike belief that your “daddy” is always right and a big strong hero who can’t lose. Usually people grow out of it, but a lot of the right don’t seemed to have matured in this way. People like Alex Jones also associates the “daddy” as his rightful place as a ruler of a household, and has gone into rants during the pandemic because some vaccine commercial dared to suggest the children might understand something better than “daddy” and may teach “daddy” something.
Atheists use the term in a similar way when they say “sky daddy.” Do you also think that just means a sexual submission kink?
Incredible how many men online I meet who confidently explain shit to me they don’t know about. Even if what you’re saying is correct, which would be irrelevant as that is not how it’s interpreted in the comments, could you explain why you think that patriarchy is seperate from your construction of children’s deference to their father? You fucking people man, seriously.
? I have no clue what gender you are, and it doesn’t really matter with my point? I just showed proof that the people being mocked are using the daddy thing themselves, and my Alex Jones example is a prime example of toxic patriarchy, so I’m not sure why you would think I would say it’s separate. Tucker is also a toxic misogynist, and I’m sure some of his jests were a combination of the sexual meaning too. I just said not everyone who uses yes daddy as an insult is doing it in a sexual manner.
Wow, you seriously didn’t get it and then wrote a smug paragraph about how you do get it and then say that you didn’t get it. I dont care if you’re pissed that this is wrong, it is and you dummies are going to admit it in five years when you see the results of this. Fuckin hell dude.
I’m sorry that you live in a world where things are related to other things and you can’t just think what you want without responsibility, it does suck. What is demeaning about this position? It’s not on behalf of “subs” and of course even if it was, how do we gender subs in our culture? I know most people aren’t too stupid to understand the connection, so I think it’s safe to assume you’re just mad about not being a good person just because you make fun of billionaires and their supporters.
I know, it literally broke all of your brains to think that sex and gender are something that results from culture. It literally didn’t make sense in your gooner brain to think about why a certain word or action carries gendered meaning. Your comment history is so fucking cringe when you are literally one of the dumbass liberals who fall for conservative shit. Unreal.
Once again associating sexual submissiveness with immorality and stupidity. Y’all really just can’t say they’re bad people for who they are for some reason, it’s always about reaffirming attacks on other groups. It’s misogynistic, it’s queerphobic, it’s ableist, and it says so little about what the actual problem is. It actually diverts attention away from the actual problem which is people with a material interest in subscribing to this system and its violence.
Responses to this comment made me realize there is a substantial number of mansplainers who only know the word “submissive” from porn. Jfc you gooners gotta shut up.
lol what are you crashing out about daddy?
It’s not sexual submissiveness—it’s blind agreement. The “Yes daddy” is just for humorous effect.
Man this is such a miserable position to take
Yes daddy isn’t always meant to be sexual. It’s something they literally said themselves, like "Daddy’s home!” and “Daddy Don!” at a rally. See https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/24/tucker-carlson-trump-rally-spanking
In this case we mean it more like childlike belief that your “daddy” is always right and a big strong hero who can’t lose. Usually people grow out of it, but a lot of the right don’t seemed to have matured in this way. People like Alex Jones also associates the “daddy” as his rightful place as a ruler of a household, and has gone into rants during the pandemic because some vaccine commercial dared to suggest the children might understand something better than “daddy” and may teach “daddy” something.
Atheists use the term in a similar way when they say “sky daddy.” Do you also think that just means a sexual submission kink?
Incredible how many men online I meet who confidently explain shit to me they don’t know about. Even if what you’re saying is correct, which would be irrelevant as that is not how it’s interpreted in the comments, could you explain why you think that patriarchy is seperate from your construction of children’s deference to their father? You fucking people man, seriously.
? I have no clue what gender you are, and it doesn’t really matter with my point? I just showed proof that the people being mocked are using the daddy thing themselves, and my Alex Jones example is a prime example of toxic patriarchy, so I’m not sure why you would think I would say it’s separate. Tucker is also a toxic misogynist, and I’m sure some of his jests were a combination of the sexual meaning too. I just said not everyone who uses yes daddy as an insult is doing it in a sexual manner.
Wow, you seriously didn’t get it and then wrote a smug paragraph about how you do get it and then say that you didn’t get it. I dont care if you’re pissed that this is wrong, it is and you dummies are going to admit it in five years when you see the results of this. Fuckin hell dude.
Are you really offended by this meme on behalf of subs? Thats pretty far from the point dont you think?
I’m sorry that you live in a world where things are related to other things and you can’t just think what you want without responsibility, it does suck. What is demeaning about this position? It’s not on behalf of “subs” and of course even if it was, how do we gender subs in our culture? I know most people aren’t too stupid to understand the connection, so I think it’s safe to assume you’re just mad about not being a good person just because you make fun of billionaires and their supporters.
Sorry I dont understand your point here.
I know, it literally broke all of your brains to think that sex and gender are something that results from culture. It literally didn’t make sense in your gooner brain to think about why a certain word or action carries gendered meaning. Your comment history is so fucking cringe when you are literally one of the dumbass liberals who fall for conservative shit. Unreal.