howdy@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 hours agowomenlemmy.mlimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1451arrow-down123
arrow-up1428arrow-down1imagewomenlemmy.mlhowdy@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 hours agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·6 hours agoNo. Go big or go home.
minus-squareLost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·7 hours agoNo. They’re saying that 93% + 93% = 186%.
minus-squareQuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-27 hours agowell if 93% is currently 10,000 murders, then women doing 10,000 murders would hypothetically turn it to 50% edit: well maybe like 57% because they already have the other 7%? but it would be lower because there is more total? I confused myself
minus-squareAllero@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoThen the murder total is 10000/0,93=10753 with 753 being on women. To equalize the statistics, women need to commit 10000-753=9247 murders.
Wouldn’t it be 50%?
No. Go big or go home.
No. They’re saying that 93% + 93% = 186%.
Ultraviolence
well if 93% is currently 10,000 murders, then women doing 10,000 murders would hypothetically turn it to 50%
edit: well maybe like 57% because they already have the other 7%? but it would be lower because there is more total? I confused myself
Then the murder total is 10000/0,93=10753 with 753 being on women.
To equalize the statistics, women need to commit 10000-753=9247 murders.