California’s new bill requires DOJ-approved 3D printers that report on themselves targeting general-purpose machines.

Assembly Member Bauer-Kahan introduced AB-2047, the “California Firearm Printing Prevention Act,” on February 17th. The bill would ban the sale or transfer of any 3D printer in California unless it appears on a state-maintained roster of approved makes and models… certified by the Department of Justice as equipped with “firearm blocking technology.” Manufacturers would need to submit attestations for every make and model. The DOJ would publish a list. If your printer isn’t on the list by March 1, 2029, it can’t be sold. In addition, knowingly disabling or circumventing the blocking software is a misdemeanor.

  • RedMari@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Is printing a lower less illegal than removing the serial number? Must be, otherwise what’s the point other than cost?

    • ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Yes. In most of the US removing a serial is explicitly illegal, while manufacturing a firearm for personal use (the serialized part is legally the firearm, but most places don’t require you to serialize personally manufactured firearms) is completely legal.

    • tomalley8342@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Serialized parts have their purchases recorded and restricted, other parts are (usually) unrestricted.

      • RedMari@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        How would they connect a serialized part to a purchase if the serial number is completely gone? I guess 3d printing would also allow those who are unable to legally buy the parts to get them too.

        • tomalley8342@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          They can’t definitively pin a particular purchase to a particular serial-defiled firearm, but the fact that the government knows that you purchased a firearm on such and such date is probably enough of a concern for a lot of people. It’s a lot easier to gather a stockpile of parts without drawing much attention.

        • ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          If there’s a record of you purchasing X gun, and they find you have that same model with the serial filed off, 99% chance you filed the serial off your gun.

        • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Because to get the serialized part, you still have to be approved for the purchase through background checks, which will go live on the state police database, and then the police can check that database to see recently acquired firearms if something happens. Chances are the list of a specific type of firearm with the serial ground off is going to be pretty short.

          And yes, the being able to obtain it with no background checks at all is the other big key.

          • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Because to get the serialized part, you still have to be approved for the purchase through background checks

            Unless you get it secondhand. Then you just kinda… Skip all that. Legally.