• horse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    As someone not looking to spend a ton of money on new hardware any time soon: good. The longer it takes to release faster hardware, the longer current hardware stays viable. Games aren’t going to get more fun by slightly improving graphics anyway. The tech we have now is good enough.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      People don’t just use computers for gaming. If this continues people will struggle to do any meaningful work on their personal computes which is definitely not good. And I’m not talking about browsing facebook but about coding, doing research, editing videos and other useful shit.

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        But wait! They can pay for remote computing time for a fraction of the cost! Each month. Forever.

        I fully expect personal computers to be phased out in favor of a remote-access, subscription model. AI popping would leave these big data centers with massive computational power available for use, plus it’s the easiest way to track literally everything you do on your system.

        • lacaio 🇧🇷🏴‍☠️🇸🇴@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 minutes ago

          Remote computing is very expensive. It’s just the gated (owned by companies) LLMs that are cheap for the final consumer. Training a 2b LLM on remote compute will cost thousands of dollars if you try to.