I’d like to give my users some private network storage (private from me, ie. something encrypted at rest with keys that root cannot obtain).

Do you have any recommendations?

Ideally, it should be something where files are only decrypted on the client, but server-side decryption would be acceptable too as long as the server doesn’t save the decryption keys to disk.

Before someone suggests that, I know I could just put lucks-encrypted disk images on the NAS, but I’d like the whole thing to have decent performance (the idea is to allow people to store their photos/videos, so some may have several GB of files).

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Bud…been doing this for 20 years. Don’t need your explainer.

    The fact you didn’t mention the barest of minimums in your comment if where the issue lies. You’re just adding stacks on stacks of things by using any other network mount and having the user manage an encrypted image inside that mount. Also absent from what you were trying to explain. I’d work on that.

    Point being, for a multi-user/tenant utility like OP is asking for, there are better tools for the job, of which I just named a couple standalone options. If they are running TrueNAS, Synology, or QNAP, or even NextCloud, there are already built-ins for this purpose, and apps to match.

    If not, any of the other solutions I mentioned are much better suited for the use-case, especially, and if not only because, OP specifically said they DID NOT want exactly what you’re describing.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The fact you didn’t mention the barest of minimums in your comment if where the issue lies.

      I described the procedure step-by-step mentioning each layer. That’s the best I could do.

      OP specifically said they DID NOT want exactly what you’re describing.

      OP said they’re worried about performance with this solution. Hence why my first response addressed the performance issue. The rest was responding to you (and anyone else who is reading) since you thought that is not an E2E solution. I tried explaining why it’s client-side encryption and no keys are stored on the host.