Those aren’t end-to-end encrypted from the user, and would need to be mounted on the local system with a key that is unique to each user. Not exactly user-friendly if supporting multiple users.

There are plenty of other solutions meant for the purpose OP is asking about.

There’s dozens out there, but the bigger question is: what’s your current hosting setup? What NAS are you running?

It would be simpler to just run something that your NAS platform supports already or has a mobile app for. Pretty much every solution you’ll find with e2e encryption is going to have its own client.

How’s everything else getting to your storage from your main container? They don’t share.

It depends on what kind of server this is. If it’s cloud-y, then you can just mount another volume and move everything there.

If it’s a amatatic VPS where you can’t uograde or change it at all, you’re not going to find a performance solution without using a CDN or manually mapping to something S3 compatible.

“Does a Shit Sandwich taste better than a Turd Burger?”

Nobody cares.

Fuck this loser. We have enough issues to deal with on a daily basis. We don’t need to subsidize your fear of having wasted ungodly amounts of money and becoming irrelevant.

That’s a YOU problem, fool.

If they require root at start, it’s more than likely they need to access devices or sockets on the host on startup. If it’s then transitioning to another uid/gid for the actual runtime in the container - which looks to be happening - its not quite rootLESS because it obviously requires root.

I’m unfamiliar with the linuxserver images, so don’t understand the need for root here.

1. No, you can’t “remove” your local networking interfaces from a container and expect it to use networking, anymore than you can remove the engine from a car, and expect it to drive. Set the default route of that container to some VPN tunnel interface, and you should be fine.
2. I’m not seeing a link to any config
3. 1000:1000 is usually the default user that is created for you when you setup a Linux system, so yes it’s reasonable for them to run as your user. It is NOT reasonable to run them as root, which is 0:0. Don’t do that.

$24/mo for 6 users and 3TB storage. All the other stuff as well.

Pricing here: https://proton.me/family

Need more details about how you’re running this test.

Proton is $15/mo for 2 users and gets you mail, 2TB drive, VPN, and Pass. Pretty worth it I’d say.

Oh no…anyway

I call BS.

You can get a WiFi or LTE trail cam that essentially to works the same. If you get LTE though, you’ll almost certainly need a VPN setup on your network as well to work around CGNAT issues.

I get that you’re aiming this at a user base of new folks and all, but I’m super confused to see Nix on there.

This is kind of…Nix’s entire identity, no?

One could also make the argument that this supercedes bootstrap tools that each distro has. Kickstart for example.

I would maybe focus on making helper scripts that do specific things for groups of users, like installing all the steam-* packages for Steam installs and not just steam itself since this is pretty opinionated on how you’re choosing to install things re: native package manager vs Flatpak and such.

Wuh oh

3 times.

You always do it 3 times.

Just change the port Headscale is running on.

You also don’t want a reverse proxy out in front of Headscale. It doesn’t serve a purpose, and does nothing but introduce added complexity and performance degradation.

Just make an A record in your DNS that points to ‘vpn.whatever.com’ if you just want to treat it as a named host.

They have Open Source versions of their stack. Just run it yourself at no cost.

Am I missing something?

Also, use any other similar service which all have open source counterparts: Head scale/Tailscale, or ZeroTier.

deleted by creator