• Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    Why is people still using google? I used it recently due to a mistake after years of using DDG and honestly, i dont know how anybody can find anything with it. Ads, paid ressults, rubbish that i didnt ask for… Maybe im just not acustom to… idk, googling? But i feel like they trully fucked it up.

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Hey guys, stop using Google and Meta and X and Amazon.

    They’re kinda ruining civilisation with their terrible ideas and all you get in exchange is news that doesn’t inform you, social interactions that are largely artificial and a permanent inability to use technology which they exploit by selling you enshittification-laden garbage.

    The price of their “free” services is way too high. Get rid of them.

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Every time I say this to someone offline, they act like it’s literally impossible. It’s so frustrating

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        In some sense they are not wrong.

        The average person has no idea how technology works because these companies do everything for them for free in exchange for their private data.

        It used to be common that kids would learn how to use computers to pirate music and burn CDs. Now the incentives to learn (free music/movies) is gone because Spotify and Google give you all you want for the low price of your privacy and eternal dependency on them for access to the fruits of technology.

        Getting your privacy back means giving up those conveniences and learning to use the technology that you depend on. For most people that is too much to ask.

        “Luckily” the deluge of algorithm enabled propaganda and resultant fascist resurgence have some people questioning this bargain.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Did you know that fascist regimes generally prefer audio dubbing films and tv shows instead of subtitles because then they get to control what the dialog says to their captive citizens ? And if most citizens can’t speak the foreign language and can’t read lips they never find any changes because how could they ?

    Google is doing the same thing here. But with your own content.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I find the AI audio translation on YouTube, which Google now seems to be imposing as standard, to be the most absurd thing of 'em all: even the intros are so poorly translated that it couldn’t be more ridiculous.

    I’m sure many users don’t realize that this is supposed to be a “feature” and mistakenly believe that the foreign-language video they deliberately clicked on is obviously AI-generated because the audio track is so horribly bad.

    Well, another reason for PeerTube…

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Fun experiment: Ask Google if there are more stars in the solar system than grains of sand in a glass of water. See the AI confidently say “yes” and then refresh the query and see it confidently say “no”.

    • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I have experimented and can very often get AI to give whatever answer I want (i.e. on a yes/no) by subtly changing the query. Super easy to manipulate the results.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I don’t know if I’d say “a lot,” but I think you are correct to say “some.” We don’t need to suddenly start flinging around generalized invectives towards science, especially when there’s already a concerted effort by conspiracy theorists and bad actors to convince people to reject science out of hand.

          • cabbage@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            True, there’s a lot of good research being produced as well. There’s just an insane amount of academic work being produced in general, both good and bad.

            • Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Yes, and I passed that research paper onto someone who works with researchers who think LLMs are the best new invention for technical writing. It’s going to be a constant battle, even amongst people who should know better.

  • hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Cool. Well I replaced Google with a million other things that are objectively better.

    Oh…is this just some attention thing to try and get me back? Aww… Sorry, G. Look, G, I’m sorry to tell you over text, but it’s over. It’s been over for years. We broke up so long ago, and it was never going to work out anyway. Please just delete me from your contacts list. It’s better this way.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I disabled the stupid "Discover” feature, which was inanity without AI.