• smitty@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    Ironically, one wouldn’t exist without the other. Our local anti-data-center group’s website is hosted on a cloud server (namecheap). Maybe it’s NIMBY—or maybe they just don’t realize they are supporting the very infrastructure they oppose.

    • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      I think the sentiment is centered around the new resource hog behemoths popping up to run LLMs and not the servers for emails, storage, e-commerce, social media, etc.

    • mrmanager@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Its not the same kind of infrastructure. We have had hosted cloud servers for decades now, but these datacenters are purpose-built to run AI, with millions of graphics cards.

      They can use more power than a city, and they use enormous amounts of water. And they seem to be loud. There has been news about people in their houses getting noise pullution around the clock, sometimes a low vibration humming noise which goes through the walls and prevents them from sleeping properly.

      I dont think there is a single advantage for people living near a datacenter. Noise and increased power bills.

    • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      A web hosting data center and a Slopware data center are 2 completely different animals.

      And where are they going to host a site? On a napkin? Fewer people have access to the hardware needed to self host today due to the ridiculous prices of hardware.