GrammarPolice@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 3 days agoI did not care for the Godfatherlemmy.worldimagemessage-square304fedilinkarrow-up1685arrow-down155
arrow-up1630arrow-down1imageI did not care for the Godfatherlemmy.worldGrammarPolice@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square304fedilink
minus-squareMonkeMischief@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down3·edit-23 days agoIt’s like the modern art money laundering Industry…but at 25 frames per second! (Or some arbitrary frame rate to stir further controversy)
minus-squareTheMinions@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·edit-23 days agoI prefer art to run at 60 FPS.
minus-squareBeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·3 days agoyou can really taste the extra perseconds
minus-squareMonkeMischief@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoThat’s the stuff, 144 if I can get away with it! 😜 Maybe not for films tho hahaha
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 days agoI can’t remember the name of the film but there is one film released relatively recently that’s just a series of photographs. Set to music. It’s literally slower than one frame per second.
minus-squareMonkeMischief@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 days agoRespectfully of course, that sounds quite literally like it’s a really long slideshow? 🤔
It’s like the
modern art
money laundering
Industry…but at 25 frames per second!
(Or some arbitrary frame rate to stir further controversy)
I prefer art to run at 60 FPS.
you can really taste the extra perseconds
you can’t just say perseconds
Pretty sure they just did.
That’s the stuff, 144 if I can get away with it! 😜
Maybe not for films tho hahaha
I can’t remember the name of the film but there is one film released relatively recently that’s just a series of photographs. Set to music.
It’s literally slower than one frame per second.
Is it a Terrence Malick film?
Respectfully of course, that sounds quite literally like it’s a really long slideshow? 🤔