The line between helpful tech and quiet surveillance is blurring — and our devices no longer feel fully under our control.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    There’s kind of been an increase in things being more accessible and usable by the standard user where previously they would need to be quite savvy or know a language.

    But, yeah, I can’t think of much else. Not user-based tech anyway. Just the usual insignificant increases and a bunch of bullshit no one asked for and actually ends up using, but has to pay for.

    I think smartphones are an excellent example. Most people wouldn’t notice the differences between a second-hand $150 Samsung Galaxy from five years ago, and the latest flagship for 10× the price. The innovation is almost entirely unnoticeable.

    • richmondez@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Only difference is lack of updates for security and latest android, turns phones into ewaste long before the end of the hardware useful life.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      In many cases that accessibility is a full-on neutered replacement for a previous system that offered more user control and customizability, removing options from power users, so one man’s progress is another man’s step backwards.

    • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      As someone with a second hand Galaxy from seven years ago, yeah there’s not really much difference. Newer phones are slightly more annoying to use, actually.