• zbyte64@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Ehh, the capitalist class doesn’t call the shots in China though, the party does. And their private corporations don’t simply have shareholders, it has party representation embedded in the control structure making “ownership” moot because ultimately the party can veto or seize production at moments notice.

    That being said, when Xi starts claiming socialism is inevitable, he does so to delay it’s implementation.

    • zikzak025@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      That just sounds like a reframing of “the party are the capitalist class” though.

      If the party either controls the corporations or has the ability to seize control if their priorities aren’t met, where does one group begin and the other end?

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Wouldn’t that have made the USSR capitalist as well? I think a key distinction is how authority within a party is established. If authority is derived from ownership then that is clearly capitalist. If authority is derived from the party itself, then that is something else.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Yeah companies like BYD have investors like Berkshire and Blackrock but the key is Wang Chuanfu who is in the party, and is the CEO and largest owner apparently. So he gets a lot of say in making himself richer apparently. Sounds like what Musk would have wanted for Tesla if he could have got MAGA off the EV hate