• Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        Much more straight forward: we’re actually homo sapiens sapiens (twice, because we’re extra smart, y’know), they’re homo sapiens neanderthalensis.

        • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          That’s the criteria for distinguishing species and subspecies, though, isn’t it? If two specimen can produce non-sterile offspring, they’re the same species.

          • Lumidaub@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Oh that’s what you were saying, now I see. Yes, that’s usually true. I thought you were saying because modern humans have Neanderthal ancestors, we’re the same species.

            • Uruanna@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Well, also yes, ipso facto? If we’re offspring of sapiens sapiens and sapiens neanderthalis, that means they had viable offsprings together, therefore they’re the same species, QED…

          • shalafi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            That’s what I was taught 35-years ago, but from comments I’ve read, I gather there’s a lot of disagreement in biology these days.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Species is a construct meant to impose a binary on a complicated reality. The division between us and Neanderthals was in the grey area. We were able to interbreed, and we did so, but it was absolutely nothing like when two groups of sapiens interact over a long period of time. You can’t separate the Gauls from the Romans in France for example. Racial separation requires heavy effort in homo sapiens, whereas we’re talking a few percentage points of Neanderthal DNA.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s a point of debate. The prevailing view is that Homo neanderthalensis is a distinct species.