• Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        It is not and as somebody who was patient with Civ VI and ultimately loved it after it was fleshed out, I don’t think it ever will be. The “play three different civs over the course of each game with a leader unrelated to any of them” thing they stole from humankind is not going away so if you’re not a fan of that you’re just going to have to skip this one.

        • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It’s still so weird to me that they did that. AFAIK Humankind did okay, wasn’t like a massive hit or anything, but the makers of Civ seem to have decided to drop everything and chase it around for some reason.

      • kopasu22@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        It’s…aight. Not as good as VI yet.

        It hasn’t received any significant gameplay changing DLC yet, and usually Civ games don’t really come into their own until then.

      • bklyn@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        honestly, I don’t know. I’ve never played a civ game is didn’t get hopelessly addicted to, but I haven’t really had the money for it yet. plus it has some DRM bullshit on it, so pirating it isn’t an option (yet).