• Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      It is not and as somebody who was patient with Civ VI and ultimately loved it after it was fleshed out, I don’t think it ever will be. The “play three different civs over the course of each game with a leader unrelated to any of them” thing they stole from humankind is not going away so if you’re not a fan of that you’re just going to have to skip this one.

      • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s still so weird to me that they did that. AFAIK Humankind did okay, wasn’t like a massive hit or anything, but the makers of Civ seem to have decided to drop everything and chase it around for some reason.

    • kopasu22@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s…aight. Not as good as VI yet.

      It hasn’t received any significant gameplay changing DLC yet, and usually Civ games don’t really come into their own until then.

    • bklyn@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      honestly, I don’t know. I’ve never played a civ game is didn’t get hopelessly addicted to, but I haven’t really had the money for it yet. plus it has some DRM bullshit on it, so pirating it isn’t an option (yet).