Here we go… It took them some time but ads is going to be inside chat gpt as well. And impossible to block.

  • 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I feel like nobody read the article. It mentioned an “ad carousel” which would be a fairly standard way to offset costs on free plans. I don’t see that specifically as being enshitification. Now, if they start altering AI responses, that is definitely enshitification. I have no doubt they will eventually get there, but I don’t think that’s what this article is about.

  • flamiera@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    You’re having a conversation in ChatGPT and all of a sudden you’re being bombarded with questions like how swell it’d be to buy something from Amazon or play this shitty-ass app game with MTX.

    What a timeline…

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      If you’re not paying, you’re the product. Even on Chinese services. Alibaba does train my favorite local models though (Qwen).

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Oh no. I’ll have to look at ads while I make use of their fantastic and totally useful product, oh yeah, never mind.

  • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The fact that they’re pivoting to full enshittification is the strongest signal yet that the AI bubble is collapsing. There won’t be an AI-driven mass-unemployment revolution this time around. OpenAI has given up on trying to build that.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Anyone else concerned that the AI bubble is actually an everything bubble, and more or less represents the devaluation of the US dollar? We have a lot of debt, we can’t necessarily keep raising interest rates to slow down spending (as that would make the debt’s impact far greater), and so they’re printing money onto the deficit. Meanwhile, you have the White House eye balling cryptocurrency, letting banks hold it alongside gold, … what does all of this mean?

      https://www.theblock.co/amp/post/333107/jpmorgan-debasement-trade-bitcoin-gold

      https://phemex.com/news/article/putin-adviser-accuses-us-of-using-stablecoins-and-gold-to-devalue-debt-17951

      https://matrixmag.com/chinas-gold-corridor-a-structural-shift-in-the-global-financial-order/

        • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Everything means something because meaning is created, not discovered. They can be greedy, idiots, and still know how to come out on top of a failing empire.

          I really think there’s a lot more to this than meets the eye. There being winners implies there being losers also. If the ultra wealthy can come out on top, it leaves the rest of the US with a debased currency on bottom.

          Is gold up 2x since 2 years ago, or is the US Dollar loosing its purchase power at a rate not seen since 1970s (Nixon took USD off gold) and 2008-11 (global housing crisis)?

          Suddenly, Elons stock-performance based bonus benchmarked at $1T makes some sense…

    • 1984@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I dont know about that. I think the fear right now is that these companies wont get enough revenue to justify their enormous evaluations. By putting ads in the product, they increase revenue but also increase Enshittification.

      I wont be using chat gpt if it becomes annoying. But many will, everyone today who is used to constant ads will.

      So im thinking this will work against the bubble popping. But I could be wrong.

      • dan1101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        If the service was truly viable they wouldn’t need to be supporting it in that way so early. Ads might delay the bubble popping but it’s not a good sign IMO. Selling ads is going to be a lot more difficult than getting millions or billions of dollars from investors.

        • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yes exactly. What they really want to offer is an AI employee replacement service. If they could replace one of your employees who makes $40k/year then they could easily charge $30k/year for the service and you (the business owner and AI customer) could add $10k to your profits.

          The fact is that they can’t do that. They can’t even make money charging thousands of dollars a year for basic LLM service that people use to write emails and the like.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        But many will, everyone today who is used to constant ads will.

        wouldn’t it stand to reason, many current users are engaged because chatGPT produces faster shitty search results without ads? compared to the alternative shitty slower search results with ads?

        • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I use Perplexity for most of my searches. Not because of ads (I have robust adblocking to the point that I’m genuinely gobsmacked whenever I’m in a situation where I can’t browse any other way, like on someone else’s machine), but because of third-party SEO and first-party paid-for search results. Perplexity is far from flawless, but unlike google, Bing, etc. and the engines which rely on them (DuckDuckGo is Bing, for example), it’s actually designed to return you the answer to your question.

          We can discuss the exact meaning of “ads” and whether the paid-for search results count. I’d say they’re similar but with subtle differences. And it’s not what’s being suggested for ChatGPT here, although for over a year now I’ve been suggesting that the AI-equivalent of SEO & paid-for search results is where we’re headed.

  • handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I suppose identifying AI is going to be a lot easier when users copy and paste answers that contain some sort of ad roll.

    It’s gonna be really hard to argue your Grapes of Wrath essay wasn’t AI generated when you submit without proofreading and don’t catch the sponsored ad for Walmart+ grocery delivery.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I don’t know that I agree. AI will continue to grow stronger and heartier, just like Campbell’s new Extra Chunky™ All Americanado™ Chicken Noodle Soup.

      • handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        After reading this I’m convinced we’ll not only know it’s AI but be able to identify which platform. We’ll get to a point where people will go must’ve used Gemini it’s the only one still serving Factor ads 😂

  • melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Too bad larger LLMs require ungodly amounts of VRAM, or self-hosting would be a good alternative. LLMs have their uses, but they’re not useful enough to put up with ads.

  • the16bitgamer@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I think we’ve hit the end times for AI. The biggest player in the space OpenAI couldn’t be profitable by selling its services to business, nor directly to consumers. Subscription moneys nor licensing its models is working too. So the last avenue they have is this, shilling to marketers hoping for scrap.

    On top of Nvidia having to stop selling RAM I think the breaks are about to hit AI and hard once the current supply runs out. I wonder how long that could take?

  • termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Sounds like my AI usage is gonna fall from “infrequent” to “never”, if the ads are indeed unblockable…

  • jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Rapid enshittification, people will just use on of the others on the long list of alternatives. I currently recommend either DeepSeek v3.2-Exp or Kimi K2 Thinking.

      • jaykrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        We aren’t going to stop AI usage, but what we can do is educate people on how to use the most efficient models. Both DeepSeek v3.20-Exp and Kimi K2 Thinking are significantly more efficient than Claude/Gemini/ChatGPT.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          We may not remove it completely but we could definitely limit or even wipe out AI data centers even on just a municipal level. Limits on resources used and strict permit requirements would be enough to shit can them in a variety of ways.

          • jaykrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yea the data center stuff is an absolute bubble, and models are becoming significantly cheaper rapidly. We won’t need all these data centers because reasonably usable AI models will be so efficient you can run them on a powerful gaming computer. Not everyone needs the absolute most powerful smartest model like Gemini 3.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              The problem with AI is largely the data center shit. Nobody has a problem with Josh pissing around with a learning algorithm to detect when to run his air conditioner optimally, what people are pissed about is building fuck off worthless data centers for bullshit thats almost certainly not worth the corpo hype.

              Obviously they aren’t completely worthless, there is worth in them being liquidated and sold off.

      • jaykrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        True, if you ask about the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre and other things typically censored by the Chinese government they won’t answer. But interestingly, there are variants that have been uncensored, and those models will answer openly if you use something like together.ai versus kimi.com. Because they are open source, they are easily uncensored.

    • 1984@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      They actually put ads in paid products also now. :)

      Never enough ads, never enough revenue.

    • Mechanize@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The big problem is that we have long stepped over that line.

      Now even when you pay you are still shown ads (maybe, but not surely, not-targeted) and your data is still scrapped and analyzed to hell and back.

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Hmm stunned disbelief, I tell ya. How on earth did anyone ever think this could happen, big corpo putting ads inside the most hyper targeted machine the world has ever seen. How could they ever decide to do this

  • network_switch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Most obvious thing to ever happen since ads being added to Instagram feeds. It’s a search engine replacement. It was going to end up with basic advertisments eventually. Then targeted advertisements. Then sponsored results as sneaky as they can be in the case of suggesting the best solution/product. Free open source models and stuff like proton and duckduckgo if you really want to use AI search engines