• twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    They don’t need to court developers, they need to court consumers. The games will be sold wherever people are buying.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Consumers have already decided mobile gambling slop is the most successful investment in the gaming industry. I don‘t trust consumers to know what‘s best for them.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I think the studies showing how certain minds can be targeted and manipulated by dark gambling patterns made me think differently about gambling. I’m less likely to blame the victims now - in many ways it can be difficult or near-impossible for them to control those impulses. I’d at least like lootbox gambling slop to be regulated the same as casinos.

        Look how popular fantasy sports is now. It’s basically just the casino industry seeking out new avenues to cheat the definition of “Playing odds to win cash”.

        • Carighan Maconar@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 minutes ago

          Yeah that shit is like selling heroine specifically to vulnerable people in depressing phases of their life. But wth gambling ads and dark patterns in video games we somehow accept it. 😕

      • Oxysis/Oxy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Well yeah gambling is addicting, the mobile slop companies know that so they try to get people addicted to it. It’s really sad what’s happened to the mobile gaming space, as it’s so heavily dominated by gambling. Hell the entire world is being run over by gambling companies now. It’s a major problem that will have to be addressed at some point soon.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      consumers

      This is very much a pet peeve, but be careful about how you use “consumer” versus “customer”. They each imply completely different power dynamics.

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Maybe some people, who are an ocean away from me, have been gaslit into thinking they can’t be anything other than consumers. I know it can be difficult to grasp the concept, but you can refuse a service if the terms are unacceptable. It is possible to go into a transaction with open eyes and full knowledge of the rights granted to you by law and responsibilities demanded of you by the contract.

          That’s why I say “customer”. It’s a reminder to myself that I should demand equitable treatment, even if the chances are slim unless the courts get involved. You don’t have to jump into the meat grinder willingly.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s very much consumer these days, people buy literally anything marketed to them.

          • warm@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I like to think I hold myself to a higher standard or at least just a standard. General consumption, I’m not sure, but for video games, people standards have dropped significantly, the masses accept a lot of bullshit and even defend it.