This is a classic illogical proposition. You are denying the antecedent. Just because you can’t see the triangles doesn’t mean that they are there. It is a necessary but not sufficient condition to state that you may have triangles if you do not see the triangles. If you have triangles, you will not see them. But just because you don’t see them won’t mean that you have them. Because nobody sees them. Logic won’t save you!
Cars are vastly more reliable. Clearly you weren’t around for carbs.
Sure, but I can fix a carburetor with a wrench and a screwdriver. Can’t do that with modern cars.
starting to not even be able ro change their brakes
Are you aware that next to your name are two red warning triangles telling everyone you’re of dubious character?
I don’t see the triangles. Is it because I have trials too? Now I’m paranoid.
This is a classic illogical proposition. You are denying the antecedent. Just because you can’t see the triangles doesn’t mean that they are there. It is a necessary but not sufficient condition to state that you may have triangles if you do not see the triangles. If you have triangles, you will not see them. But just because you don’t see them won’t mean that you have them. Because nobody sees them. Logic won’t save you!
Yep. There is a huge echo chamber here who don’t like when things like, cars being objectively more reliable, are pointed out.