didnt read the article, does this have any implications at all?
There are basically only first or second generation land thieves. I think thats the implication, just reiterating that Israelis are land thieves.
There’s no such thing as second generation land thieves. A person is either a land thief, or the descendant of land thieves. I can go back at least five generations in my family and no land thieves, but I’m still a descendant of land thieves. I’m white and live in the US, so it’s a forgone conclusion. I’m also a descendant of a rapist somewhere in my lineage, and a victim of rape as well.
People born in Israel and just existing there aren’t land thieves, but those that move there, or are “settlers”, or endorse and support the “settler” policies are certainly land thieves.
To be clear, Benjamin Netanyahu is a cunt, for sure, and a land thief.
People born in Israel and just existing there aren’t land thieves
Until they join the IDF (which is mandatory) and become land thieves once again.
bad man bad
Yes. The “article” is 9 sentences long and explains the implications quite clearly.
Sorry if I came over as not caring, “what implications does this have” was closer to what I was trying to say. Anyway armed with the knowledge that this isn’t just another article that’s going to take half a day to read I read it and got my questions answered. Bad man bad.
Haha no worries at first I was going to reply with a quote from the article but when I realized just how short it is it kinda didn’t make sense to do so
