He’s focusing so hard on his themes being timeless that he’s no longer challenging the audience. Which is why they’re only winning visual art Oscars.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    12 hours ago

    He’s focusing so hard on his themes being timeless that he’s no longer challenging the audience. Which is why they’re only winning visual art Oscars.

    I mean he’s been using visual shortcuts to human emotional states instead of, you know, character development since fucking Titanic, if not before.

    The obvious example to contrast the Avatar films with is District 9, which came of the same year as the first Avatar film. The “prawns” of District 9 are absolutely ugly to behold, but they are “humanized” through character development instead of shortcuts like giving them giant, dewy, innocent looking eyes and making them look like innocent animals like cats or dogs. Cameron make the Na’vi aesthetically pleasing to humans because it’s easier to make them the “good guys” this way than it is if they looked like District 9’s “prawns.”

    I mean, no shade, Cameron is good at using the techniques he has chosen as a way to short circuit his audience into feeling the things he wants them to feel… but that doesn’t make them not cheap, easy, and overall weak compared to serious character development since it’s a complete reliance on visual shortcuts to emotional depth without the actual emotional depth.

  • LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    People love to shit on these movies, but they’re entertaining and beautiful, and I’d take them over any Marvel movie I can think of.

    • Sidyctism II.@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Beautiful? Definitely.
      Entertaining? Maybe the first time.
      Better than any marvel movie you can think of?
      Probably, as long as you dont think about
      iron man 1. but thats also not a high bar to clear.

    • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I don’t find them entertaining.

      I’ll grant you the artwork going in to them is wonderfully done, the cinematography is better than the marvel movies but that’s a frighteningly low bar. But the storytelling, character development, and you know, movie part of the avatar movies is a boring slog.

        • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Weirdly enough, that has been my biggest issue with both. The military is portrayed so over the top, that it’s laughable.

          I get it, military bad, natives good, I’m totally on board with that, but give them some nuance!