SSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoturing completenesssopuli.xyzimagemessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up11Karrow-down127
arrow-up1976arrow-down1imageturing completenesssopuli.xyzSSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square69fedilink
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·2 months agoSince when do they pass the Turing test? They’re infuriatingly bad.
minus-squarevodka@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up21·2 months agoEven the first version of ChatGPT passed turing tests. It takes surprisingly little for an LLM to make natural language responses that are indistinguishable from a human. Especially when factual accuracy was never part of it.
minus-squarezaph@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·2 months agoConsidering how easy they were to break by saying “ignore previous instructions” I’ma have to disagree
minus-squarevodka@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoI’m sure that’d work on some humans too.
minus-squarepotoooooooo ✅️@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoDon’t listen to this guy.
Since when do they pass the Turing test? They’re infuriatingly bad.
Even the first version of ChatGPT passed turing tests.
It takes surprisingly little for an LLM to make natural language responses that are indistinguishable from a human. Especially when factual accuracy was never part of it.
Considering how easy they were to break by saying “ignore previous instructions” I’ma have to disagree
I’m sure that’d work on some humans too.
Don’t listen to this guy.