• AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    So interesting to me that Americans think being dependent on a car is “freedom”. Individual freedom should be the freedom to get to where you need to go with viable options to walk, bike, train, bus, tram, or drive.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think you’re focusing too much on the “individual freedom” bit and missing the “at the cost or inconvenience of others” bit

    • doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      We rarely have other viable options. Long before most of us were born, the U.S. built an infrastructure centered around cars, sidelining other forms of transportation.

      In America, owning a car is often the key to freedom of movement. So it’s no surprise people equate cars with freedom. Getting people to see how car dependency actually limits our freedom is like trying to wake someone from the Matrix.

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      To be fair the mindset that a car means freedom is also quite common in Germany too. Especially in the countryside (tbf its often required if you dont want waste a lot of time due to shitty public transportation)

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      No one can make a profit on people walking, so I dont understand how your point makes any sense.

      edit: oh wait! footware and sports drink companies. OK, well, you’ve made some compelling points here. And we use small handed children to in America to make these shoes and sports drinks, right?