The person downvoting you doesn’t understand probability or statistics lmao
The person downvoting you doesn’t understand probability or statistics lmao
To be fair, Elon never specified exactly what he meant by the word “briefly” and the phrase “serve as a boat”
Oh wait, yes he did


You decided to rage at my completely innocuous comment an entire day after I posted it, I’m not the one trying to flex here. Why are you so mad


My comment has 7 upvotes actually 💪😤
You’re bad at hyperbole dude


I do the work of three people for the salary of 3/4 of a person
Know your worth and be willing to walk away.
But then you’d be the owner of something called a Brother P-Touch
(I know it’s a great label maker, I just can’t pass up a chance at low brow humor when it presents itself)
Why would we
No, i haven’t.
K. That also has little to do with what you eat.
No deliberate misunderstanding here, your point just wasn’t very clear.
I mostly agree with you, btw. I brush my teeth twice a day, morning and night. I shower when I feel like I need a shower. Sometimes that’s morning, sometimes that’s night. I don’t get night sweats every time I go to sleep.
Neither of your points in either of your threads makes sense. Do you brush your teeth before getting out of bed? Do you shower before getting out of bed?
What you eat has very little to do with hair texture
I eat dinner though


Eh I already got enough plastic in my balls


Ah ok cool, that was the sort of middle ground option I was missing


Honest question, not necessarily for you but for maybe one of those people that actually understands the registry - how do those people figure that stuff out? Like, do software authors actually publish their registry config, or do people have to decompile/reverse engineer things to figure out what registry settings a given program might use?


I commented to ask why you posted a comment that added nothing to the conversation. The first comment you replied to made a valid comparison to where the laws in question have already been implemented. Instead of engaging with that productively, you rudely dismissed it out of hand.
I don’t think there’s necessarily anything inherently wrong with that statement. A police force acting in the interests of the citizenry to protect and serve them should take any threat seriously. Where things fall apart though is trying to claim that sending multiple vehicles full of heavily armed SWAT agents to someone’s house based on a single prank call is the same as “taking the threat serious”.