• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    What do you mean this has been disproven?

    Can you provide some context. A link maybe?

    • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If you visit the official website of krafton https://www.krafton.com/en/ you should get this pop up:

      Basically, Krafton claims that the 3 founders they fired did not do their job in overseeing the project, leading to a game without any direction. Since the game would not meet their standards, they decided to rework a lot and push the release date back.

      This is an official statement of a company, meaning they can be (and if I read it correctly have been) sued for slander should they lie here. So a legal department looked over this and decided “Yep, we can claim that they abandoned responsibilities, we can prove that in court”. That’s really bad.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yea but what are executive responsibilities to a company? They generally are not creative and dynamic positions and instead focus on producing results for the corporate body. I could readily see Krafton firing them for trying to make a fun and compelling game as opposed to a profitable game ripe for DLC, for example. Of course they’d couch such money grubbing expectations in to language of the managerial class…