• MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I tried reverse image search of just the body to see if there was a “sexy toilet” costume. No luck, so I’m suspicious.

      I did find this though…

      • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I tried but it didn’t work. Kept getting hung up when I tired to sign in.

        Also doesn’t using AI to detect AI defeat the purpose of screening for AI?

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            So if it’s been steganographied with something the tool you use doesn’t check for, you’d never know. If someone’s post-processed the picture enough, the steganography will be destroyed and you’d never know. If the image was generated with a model that never embedded anything, you’d never know.

            So as ever, AI detectors are unreliable snake oil and should not be mentioned except to point out how unreliable they are.

          • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Hey, thanks I learned something (I think). Computer shit isn’t my area of nerdery, but from what I gather AI images gets stamped with invisible water marks and you can detect these with software (rather than AI) if that software knows what the watermark is (which is kept secret by the AI provider)