So if it’s been steganographied with something the tool you use doesn’t check for, you’d never know. If someone’s post-processed the picture enough, the steganography will be destroyed and you’d never know. If the image was generated with a model that never embedded anything, you’d never know.
So as ever, AI detectors are unreliable snake oil and should not be mentioned except to point out how unreliable they are.
Hey, thanks I learned something (I think). Computer shit isn’t my area of nerdery, but from what I gather AI images gets stamped with invisible water marks and you can detect these with software (rather than AI) if that software knows what the watermark is (which is kept secret by the AI provider)
the openai one does not require signin.
it’s not AI. it’s a kind of hidden watermark or steganography called SynthID
see also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_watermarking, although this one is about text watermarking.
So if it’s been steganographied with something the tool you use doesn’t check for, you’d never know. If someone’s post-processed the picture enough, the steganography will be destroyed and you’d never know. If the image was generated with a model that never embedded anything, you’d never know.
So as ever, AI detectors are unreliable snake oil and should not be mentioned except to point out how unreliable they are.
Nothings perfect. I dont think anyone’s going that far out of their way to avoid detection with a sexy skibidi costume picture.
“That far”?
Hey, thanks I learned something (I think). Computer shit isn’t my area of nerdery, but from what I gather AI images gets stamped with invisible water marks and you can detect these with software (rather than AI) if that software knows what the watermark is (which is kept secret by the AI provider)