• Fishnoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    They never comprehend. They ingest information and find close approximations for responses, but they don’t comprehend any part of the process. If they did, they wouldn’t hallucinate complete bullshit answers and spit them out like they were fact

    • encelado748@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      To be honest human spew bullshit all the time when they do not understand something. Or people are confidently incorrect all the time as they are remembering incorrectly. The amount of bullshitting is more a meter for intelligence, not something that discriminate between intelligence or the lack thereof.

      • DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You are anthropomorphizing LLMs: This is a mistake. They are not people and they do not think, reason, or feel. They are completely incapable of these things. Even calling it “AI” is misleading at best.

        • encelado748@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I am not. I want to understand what is the difference between “feeling” as result of electrochemical reactions in our brain and “feeling” as result of math performed on a numerical matrix. I am perfectly aware those are not the same, but the result may be similar, and what we care of the result determines the conclusions we can make.

          You need to clearly explain what is thinking and what in the “thinking” process of LLM is not thinking. If you define “thinking” as electromechanical reactions in human brains then LLM is not thinking, but it is not a useful definition.

            • encelado748@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Do you even know what a claim is?

              they do not think, reason, or feel. They are completely incapable of these things.

              This is a claim. You made a claim. My assertion that you need to substantiate your claim definitionally does not constitute a claim.

                  • DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 hour ago

                    I’m already dropping it because extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Here even mediocre evidence hasn’t been provided to back up ridiculous claims anthropomorphizing “AI” so we are free to dismiss them outright.

                    Furthermore, you’re now trying to claim there are no such claims, which is obviously ridiculous, so feel free to fuck off and troll somebody else because I am done entertaining your bullshit.