The pioneering computer scientist on why Trump is using ‘superintelligence’ wrong, whether AI could wipe out humanity – and how our biggest challenge will be accepting we’re not the only intelligent beings
To be honest human spew bullshit all the time when they do not understand something. Or people are confidently incorrect all the time as they are remembering incorrectly. The amount of bullshitting is more a meter for intelligence, not something that discriminate between intelligence or the lack thereof.
You are anthropomorphizing LLMs: This is a mistake. They are not people and they do not think, reason, or feel. They are completely incapable of these things. Even calling it “AI” is misleading at best.
I am not. I want to understand what is the difference between “feeling” as result of electrochemical reactions in our brain and “feeling” as result of math performed on a numerical matrix. I am perfectly aware those are not the same, but the result may be similar, and what we care of the result determines the conclusions we can make.
You need to clearly explain what is thinking and what in the “thinking” process of LLM is not thinking. If you define “thinking” as electromechanical reactions in human brains then LLM is not thinking, but it is not a useful definition.
I’m already dropping it because extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Here even mediocre evidence hasn’t been provided to back up ridiculous claims anthropomorphizing “AI” so we are free to dismiss them outright.
Furthermore, you’re now trying to claim there are no such claims, which is obviously ridiculous, so feel free to fuck off and troll somebody else because I am done entertaining your bullshit.
To be honest human spew bullshit all the time when they do not understand something. Or people are confidently incorrect all the time as they are remembering incorrectly. The amount of bullshitting is more a meter for intelligence, not something that discriminate between intelligence or the lack thereof.
You are anthropomorphizing LLMs: This is a mistake. They are not people and they do not think, reason, or feel. They are completely incapable of these things. Even calling it “AI” is misleading at best.
I am not. I want to understand what is the difference between “feeling” as result of electrochemical reactions in our brain and “feeling” as result of math performed on a numerical matrix. I am perfectly aware those are not the same, but the result may be similar, and what we care of the result determines the conclusions we can make.
You need to clearly explain what is thinking and what in the “thinking” process of LLM is not thinking. If you define “thinking” as electromechanical reactions in human brains then LLM is not thinking, but it is not a useful definition.
I don’t need to explain shit, you’re the one making the claims. The burden of proof is on you.
Do you even know what a claim is?
This is a claim. You made a claim. My assertion that you need to substantiate your claim definitionally does not constitute a claim.
Bullahit;: YOU made the claim without evidence, I dismissed your baseless claim.
Please quote the claim I made you disputed, I will try to defend it or drop it.
I’m already dropping it because extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Here even mediocre evidence hasn’t been provided to back up ridiculous claims anthropomorphizing “AI” so we are free to dismiss them outright.
Furthermore, you’re now trying to claim there are no such claims, which is obviously ridiculous, so feel free to fuck off and troll somebody else because I am done entertaining your bullshit.
This gives me “are you smarter than a fifth grader” vibes