• ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah so this is how this shit gets normalized.

    Fuck Adobe yeah but don’t fuckin use ai.

    Funny how the general mood for ai has shifted. Find an alternative or you’re just another part of the problem

    • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      There already a bunch of good open source alternatives but some reason everyone wants to stay with adobe

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I appreciate the sentiment, but I would not try it at this point - some people have said that it would straight up corrupt files when attempting to save, and I wouldn’t risk it like this, even with backups.

    Maybe I should just give Darktable another chance.

  • nullify3112@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Am I the only one who’s been happy with Affinity on Linux? I know it’s still corporate BS that came from a good intention and got turned into this freemium by Canva. I know it will enshittify as soon as market share allows. I’m happier with this for now than I am with gimp. So what’s worse, enshittifying freemium or AI Slopensource?

    • Flaxseed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Anecdotal: I have wanted to replay a game that was a core part of my childhood. It was only really popular in Scandinavia. Nothing I’ve tried in the past many years worked (to be fair, it was also beyond my skillset). Couple days ago I just gave AI the task to make the game work under wine. Couple hours later and I’m playing it on Linux without issue. Even discovered and patched two bugs related to video decoding in wine to make it work. I would not find anyone else with the interest to make this game work I think!

  • Dogiedog64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    For as evil and Hitler-coded as Adobe is, AI slop is so much worse.

    I want both to get nuked into glass.

  • df0@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Personally I don’t need adobe or slop adobe. After many attempts and some effort I found that the non-AI open source alternatives were good enough, or in some cases even better, once I had a more open mind and stopped expecting them to be 1:1 to adobe.

    • pool_spray_098@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I agree with one exception.

      The AI denoising in Lightroom is absolutely spectacular, and I can’t find anything in league with it in open source. I’m sure that will change soon, though.

      • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s basically what AI is best at: incorporating lots and lots of data points (every single pixel on an image, many trillions of pixels on previous images used to train the model) to determine the best answer to a question with clear definitions of what is better or worse on a single-dimensional quality axis that most people would agree on. In this case, whether a de-noised photo looks good and accurately represents the image that could have been captured of the exact same scene using more light or a better sensor or whatever.

        It’s generative AI where things fall apart. The analogy I always use is that these math techniques are great for inferring what is between pixels in a low res image, but starts going off the rails when it starts guessing what’s beyond the edges of the image. These AI algorithms are just math, and math with this many data points needs to start considering the limitations described by chaos theory (in the mathematical sense).

    • blinfabian@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      i love gimp, but the trouble you need to go through to make text with outline is just painful. ive done it that way for years now and i recently learned on photoshop its just a toggle :c

      • nieminen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I never understood when people say gimp is an alternative to Photoshop. Gimp is closer to MS paint than Photoshop.

        • EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          No, it can’t do half the things MS Paint can, either. If anything, what it compares most closely to are older versions of JASC Paint Shop Pro. But since my image editing requirements are fairly basic, GIMP is actually pretty good for my usage.

        • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah I absolutely love FOSS and we should support it and use it, but also let’s not lie and glaze (albeit great) projects into something they’re not, or at least are not yet. Because then it becomes this weird circlejerk of implying that it’s just a skill issue actually, if you can’t manage to move your entire workflow to x Foss project.

          This is especially true when talking to creative professionals who have been pigeonholed into a certain software or system of apps. And to pretend that this is just an individual issue is extremely dense, this is another example of capitalism providing “so much freedom and choice” and meanwhile, there’s very clear monopolies that are reinforced by industry standards, advertising, and public opinion being swayed by said advertising and conditioning.

            • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              Many people in YouTube comments, which sure I’m sure that a good number of them are bots. But even if only 20% are people, that’s still a good number of people saying this rhetoric.

              Also the person above did not implicate that either. I was just talking generally.

    • nieminen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      My perspective is, I’m happy the tool is being used to harm the financial interests of these awful companies. Adobe is who kicked off the whole subscription craze that swept through every other industry. These greedy assholes even steal all your personal works to feed to their AI machine as a prerequisite for using their tools.

  • SeventySeven@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Ever since AI reversed engineered Adobe products, we can now get it to run much easier on Linux natively. At least something positive is coming from AI. I’m not saying AI is the bees knees or anything, but i can’t lie and say im not enjoying how we’re now using AI against these greedy corpos who told us to get used to not owning our games and constantly shoving AI down our throat. Well, now we’re using it just like you wanted! 😊 (well I’m still not actually going to unironically use it but you get what I meant lol)

    • stinkytofuisgood@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      They’re gonna keep coming after hardware ownership and jacking up prices like they’ve been working on. Even if you get an Intel Arc Pro card that’s moderately affordable, you’re gonna need a reBAR / Above 4G encoding compatible mobo to handle it, along with all the other system components that are already unaffordable for most.

      They’re gonna buy up platforms like they did with Hugging Face to stop as much proliferation of the open-weight models as they can. And enshittify them ala every other thing they own

      No more tinfoil hats and excuses, this shit is happening and is gonna keep happening. If revenue can go up, they’re gonna make it go up at any cost.

      The final cost may be deadly.

      Edit: for the record, I agree with you.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Stop making poor excuses for using AI. both AI and Adobe are evil. Juts pirate photoshop, put in some effort and creativity and stop complaining, unless it’s about AI.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s still leaves you dependent on a corporation. I prefer a world where they no longer exist because it isn’t economically viable anymore.

      • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Why? An old copy of photoshop 7 or CS has no dependancy on any corporation. Even if Adobe goes bankrupt, the pirated old versions still work perfectly. You’re just missing the AI tools the newer versions have, which is a bonus because, again, fuck AI.

      • ∃∀λ@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re still dependent on Adobe if you use a clone of their software which has been cleanroom reverse engineered and re-implemented. And then it needs to happen all over again when Adobe releases a new version. It’s just a Rube Goldberg way of getting Photoshop and the clone is probably a buggy mess.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s not a copy of adobe’s code, it’s all new code that’s simply implements the same features. So Adobe releasing a new version won’t have any effect.

        • Aeder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          If you get enough people to move to the clone, that stops being true though. The clone gets to decide the direction from that point onwards.

    • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Juts pirate photoshop

      Fuck that, piracy gives them more legitimacy than they deserve. I will use gimp.

      • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I cannot understand anything from gimp. It’s so counter intuitive, I even prefer ms paint over gimp. Sad, because I would love to have a proper alternative to PS.

        • stinkytofuisgood@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Same here. I use Gimp but I don’t like the UI at all.

          Also the name makes me think of a Gimp suit every fucking time. I know it’s an acronym but guys that’s a poorly thought-out acronym to use…

        • Bhaelfur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I found that the PhotoGIMP patch helps transition from Photoshop to GIMP.

          this patch transforms GIMP’s interface by mimicking Photoshop’s layout, reorganizing tools, adjusting canvas settings, and reassigning keyboard shortcuts to match Adobe’s documentation.

        • cley_faye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s probably for three reasons:

          • some “interesting” UI decision in GIMP
          • force of habits
          • GIMP is not a replacement for photoshop

          Photoshop merges two very different things, editing and drawing. If you do only editing, GIMP is great. If you also do drawing/painting, GIMP is completely subpar, but Krita is fantastic.

          There’s also other tools of course. But GIMP, by itself, is not close to be a remplacement for all of photoshop.

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            “Use gimp to replace photoshop!” - Linux users

            “GIMP is not a replacement for photoshop” - Also linux users

            • bstix@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Maybe there are as many different Linux users as there are Photoshop alternatives.

              At least 2-3…I mean, some day, there will be as many Linux users.

        • Wataba@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Thank you. Im so sick of gimp being the constant recommendation when its UI sucks so much.

          Not that ive found any other good options. The one that came close, Affinity, had controls so wack compared to what I’m used to that I gave up when it asked me to log in, again. Which in itself was giving me some real shady vibes.

          • Toes♀@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Have you tried Krita?

            I’ve been trying to familiarize myself with it and found it way more appealing than gimp. But it’s still not close to a 1:1 for Photoshop’s flow.

        • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I felt that when I had to try using Photoshop at work once. Then after 20 minutes I just installed gimp.