Stamets@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agoI mean... I don't see the problem?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square64fedilinkarrow-up1668arrow-down113file-text
arrow-up1655arrow-down1imageI mean... I don't see the problem?lemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square64fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarebrown567@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoIt doesn’t anymore =( 5e uses diagonal = 5’
minus-squareedgemaster72@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoAlternating diagonals is in the (2014) DMG as an optional rule at least
minus-squarebrown567@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoOh good! Octagons are a much better approximation of a circle than squares
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year ago4e just used “squares” instead of 5 feet, but it, like 5e, used chebyshev distances. Pathfinder 2e uses alternating diagonals though.
minus-squareVespair@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoWell anything after 3.5e is a watered-down, bastardized version of the game anyway.
It doesn’t anymore =(
5e uses diagonal = 5’
Alternating diagonals is in the (2014) DMG as an optional rule at least
Oh good! Octagons are a much better approximation of a circle than squares
4e just used “squares” instead of 5 feet, but it, like 5e, used chebyshev distances.
Pathfinder 2e uses alternating diagonals though.
Well anything after 3.5e is a watered-down, bastardized version of the game anyway.