• TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          have you ever had anyone argue with you about your star sign?

          I have, it was wild. They insisted my DOB was wrong and I was totally a Capricorn. They also argued with me that my job was awful and unfulfilling, despite me saying I enjoyed it. That was also bizarre.

          • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            That was also bizarre.

            No! It was one of the most normal experiences of your life!

            • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              Sadly, yeah it is getting more like that year after year. Too many tiktok crackhead crazies out there, and they didn’t exist 5 year ago.

    • decolo@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I like to think of astrology as a fine grained personality shorthand like Meyers Briggs.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You forgot the part about how it’s determined by giant balls of gas millions of light years away that aren’t actually arranged in neat patterns, but are actually incredibly far from one another and only look like patterns from our specific position in the universe

          • kolmaskommentoija@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Personally I do find it interesting, when people do tell their Myers-Briggs -test results, since it can tell about, what sort of a person they want to be. But it is not scientific in the slightest.

        • decolo@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s clearly pseudoscientific nonsense. But it’s easier to say “I’m a pisces” instead of “I’m feeling hesitant about the future of our relationship, Sarah” if she is into that. The value is in being able to reference loose personality archetypes without having to spend a paragraph describing someone.

          • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            But being a Pisces doesn’t mean anything, does it? It could both mean being someone who is afraid of risks and someone who is bold and takes chances.

            How is it easier?

            • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              it means what people want it to mean.

              And that’s why Astrology is so powerful. it’s 100% projection and bias confirmation.

              ‘take chances’ is entirely relative. what is a bold risk for one person, is an afterthought for another person, but in astrology there is no specific context, just vague nonsense worded such that anyone can project onto it.

            • decolo@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              It’s all contextual, honestly, but here are my impressions of the uh, categories:

              Pisces: wishy washy, both sides, indecisive, peacemaker, likes blue stuff

              Capricorn: hustle culture, hates fun

              Taurus: confident, aggressive, clumsy, bro-ish

              I don’t have any others on deck without looking them up lol

          • imadethis@fedinsfw.app
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            The problem is that you’re not really referencing “loose personality archetypes” in these sorts of conversations, they’re being assigned to you, relatively arbitrarily. It doesn’t matter if I’m serious and thoughtful, but because I was born on the third moon after the pomegranate harvest, I’m the joker of the group.

            • decolo@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              No, I think it’s pretty reasonable to push back if you’re being pigeonholed into some kind of archetype you disagree with. Tell them to stop being such Capricorns. The trick is it doesn’t really matter what sign you use, it’s just a bit

        • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Early in our dating, my wife had me take the enneagram test. I got a 2, she’s a 9. I told her I found a page detailing relationships between 2’s and 9’s and some of the strengths and weaknesses we’d navigate as a couple.

          As I was reading it she kept saying, at first, “That makes sense!” Or “Yeah I can see that.” There were a few that were kind of out there. But she kept listening.

          Eventually I revealed to her that I was ACTUALLY reading a page detailing relationships between a dragon and a sheep, our respective Chinese Zodiac signs. And that I was using this to support my argument that personality tests are astrology for educated people.

          Still ended up getting laid, though not that day. 😅

      • ickplant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That argument falls flat to me simply because there are 13 zodiac signs, not 12, and ancient (and modern) astrologers simply ignore the 13th one (Ophiuchus) for convenience.

        If you are going to claim the stars have influence over our personalities, at least be consistent with how you “read” said stars.

        Not to mention, there is zero evidence that astrology works.

        • Bytemite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Also, at the time most of the zodiac and star chart arrangements were plotted out, the Earth had an entirely different north star than it does now. So your modern star sign would not even be consistent with the ancient charts and star signs, yet somehow all the same definitions and assumptions are supposed to apply.

          • ickplant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I can appreciate that view point as long as we are in agreement that there is no real science behind it. I can totally see how people use “I’m such a Pisces” to describe themselves as sensitive and emotional. I just wish they would say “I’m sensitive and emotional” instead, lol.

            • decolo@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I tried to express that as clearly as I could, it’s just like a more ethical version of Slytherin/gryffindor/etc, I tend to be friends with excessively referential people I guess.

      • iegod@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        A trait can apply to anyone in any category. The whole premise is an exercise in the celebration of ignorance. I won’t stand for it.