Pavan Davuluri says the rising cost of memory is why Windows 11 will use less RAM, with work on the memory manager, WinUI 3 and WebView2.

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It’s hard for the younger generation to understand, but 4 Gb of RAM is MORE than enough for 99% of tasks if your software isn’t written by lazy idiots.

    • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Heh. I have a core 2 duo (Compaq CQ45, circa 2010) with 4gb running Zorin Lite OS. For 99.99% for every day tasks (and then some) it runs excellently, with about 600-800mb in reserve before caching. We’re talking YouTube, LibreOffice, multiple Firefox tabs, GIMP…all it needed was a cheap ssd to replace the spinning rust.

      For context: this thing struggles to run Half Life 2 at any sort of reasonable speeds (though that’s an iGPU issue to be fair).

      Last glance this laptop costs $20AUD to purchase off eBay.

    • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I still remember having a 4gb of ram on win7, and it’s enough for day to day tasks. The only thing that prompt me to upgrade to 8gb is games. It’s not too far ago MS recommend 16gb as a baseline for win11.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah, I wish current devs would understand that I didn’t buy a shitload of ram for them to waste it. I bought it so I could have a shitload of things running at the same time. I currently have like 6 applications running and I’m using 20gb of ram ffs.

    • Dave.@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      WinXP ran quite nicely on 4GB of RAM. You could boot to the desktop in under 5 seconds if you had a solid state drive.

      All the day to day tasks someone needs to do with their computers haven’t materially changed in the last twenty years since XP held the crown. In that time the speed of processors, storage, gpus, and ram has increased by literal orders of magnitude.

      And yet, somehow, things have become much shittier since then.

      • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Because what used to be a native application that used 200 mb of RAM now needs to be a web application built on top of a browser using 4 gb of RAM to do the exact same task.

        I will honest to God pick fucking Eclipse over VS Code every single day, because at least it runs natively.

    • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      When the Raspberry Pi 3 first came out I was shocked how much it could do with less than a gigabyte of RAM (it technically has one gig but it shares it with the GPU). Linux is ridiculously lean when packaged right.

      I have an Android tablet with four gigabytes of RAM that sometimes crashes running Firefox with multiple tabs, something the Pi somehow managed with a fraction the resources. Windows often struggled with eight gigabytes before I upgraded.

      • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Raspberry Pi 3 first came out

        I put Retropie on mine, the pi3b I think w/wifi, only emu that had issues that I wanted to use was the N64, everything else was butter