gigaqps@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 3 days agoEmpirical datalemmy.worldimagemessage-square42linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageEmpirical datalemmy.worldgigaqps@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square42linkfedilink
minus-squareSubArcticTundra@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoLeft is better because the poop hole is outside if the trousers
minus-squareMongostein@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoI propose a 3rd option: a pair of pants for front and back legs. A male dog wouldn’t be able to pee in those.
minus-squareGloriousGasHole@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoI feel like that defeats the purpose of pants though. If it’s cold outside, I want to keep the McNuggets warm. I’m now picturing what it might be like if we all walked around in pants where the only parts exposed were the front and our butt hole.
minus-squareMongostein@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoFor a human yes, but dogs loooooove to pee on stuff, even in the winter
minus-squareI_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoThey make those for potty training. https://tinyundies.com/products/tiny-chaps-baby-chaps-split-pants-for-elimination-communication?srsltid=AU7gw4WmS_hOkg2fPFnPhzjUWtL-4MtXb8NfNlXvVn-bzMf79Pmaktbv
minus-squareSeth Taylor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoOoooooh, this trend makes so much more sense now
minus-squareSeductiveTortoise@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoYou’re making a good argument here.
minus-squareMBech@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoBut also doesn’t cover up the genitals, which is my main reason for ever even wearing pants.
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoNot warmth and protection from thorny branches?
minus-squareMBech@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoI’m not some manly bushman traversing the wilderness on my daily journey to the office. I just don’t want Dorothy from HR on my ass…
minus-squareAmerica@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoThey trapped his member but maintained the freedom of his testicles. This is the future that liberals want
minus-square[deleted]@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoPlus the tail can wag freely!
Left is better because the poop hole is outside if the trousers
I propose a 3rd option: a pair of pants for front and back legs. A male dog wouldn’t be able to pee in those.
I feel like that defeats the purpose of pants though. If it’s cold outside, I want to keep the McNuggets warm.
I’m now picturing what it might be like if we all walked around in pants where the only parts exposed were the front and our butt hole.
For a human yes, but dogs loooooove to pee on stuff, even in the winter
They make those for potty training.
https://tinyundies.com/products/tiny-chaps-baby-chaps-split-pants-for-elimination-communication?srsltid=AU7gw4WmS_hOkg2fPFnPhzjUWtL-4MtXb8NfNlXvVn-bzMf79Pmaktbv
Ooooooh, this trend makes so much more sense now
You’re making a good argument here.
But also doesn’t cover up the genitals, which is my main reason for ever even wearing pants.
Not warmth and protection from thorny branches?
I’m not some manly bushman traversing the wilderness on my daily journey to the office. I just don’t want Dorothy from HR on my ass…
They trapped his member but maintained the freedom of his testicles. This is the future that liberals want
You assume he still has his testicles…
Plus the tail can wag freely!
This!