gigaqps@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 month agoEmpirical datalemmy.worldimagemessage-square42linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageEmpirical datalemmy.worldgigaqps@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square42linkfedilink
minus-squareSubArcticTundra@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoLeft is better because the poop hole is outside if the trousers
minus-squareMongostein@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoI propose a 3rd option: a pair of pants for front and back legs. A male dog wouldn’t be able to pee in those.
minus-squareGloriousGasHole@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoI feel like that defeats the purpose of pants though. If it’s cold outside, I want to keep the McNuggets warm. I’m now picturing what it might be like if we all walked around in pants where the only parts exposed were the front and our butt hole.
minus-squareMongostein@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoFor a human yes, but dogs loooooove to pee on stuff, even in the winter
minus-squareI_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoThey make those for potty training. https://tinyundies.com/products/tiny-chaps-baby-chaps-split-pants-for-elimination-communication?srsltid=AU7gw4WmS_hOkg2fPFnPhzjUWtL-4MtXb8NfNlXvVn-bzMf79Pmaktbv
minus-squareSeth Taylor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoOoooooh, this trend makes so much more sense now
minus-squareSeductiveTortoise@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoYou’re making a good argument here.
minus-square[deleted]@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoPlus the tail can wag freely!
minus-squareMBech@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoBut also doesn’t cover up the genitals, which is my main reason for ever even wearing pants.
minus-squareAmerica@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoThey trapped his member but maintained the freedom of his testicles. This is the future that liberals want
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoNot warmth and protection from thorny branches?
minus-squareMBech@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoI’m not some manly bushman traversing the wilderness on my daily journey to the office. I just don’t want Dorothy from HR on my ass…
Left is better because the poop hole is outside if the trousers
I propose a 3rd option: a pair of pants for front and back legs. A male dog wouldn’t be able to pee in those.
I feel like that defeats the purpose of pants though. If it’s cold outside, I want to keep the McNuggets warm.
I’m now picturing what it might be like if we all walked around in pants where the only parts exposed were the front and our butt hole.
For a human yes, but dogs loooooove to pee on stuff, even in the winter
They make those for potty training.
https://tinyundies.com/products/tiny-chaps-baby-chaps-split-pants-for-elimination-communication?srsltid=AU7gw4WmS_hOkg2fPFnPhzjUWtL-4MtXb8NfNlXvVn-bzMf79Pmaktbv
Ooooooh, this trend makes so much more sense now
You’re making a good argument here.
Plus the tail can wag freely!
This!
But also doesn’t cover up the genitals, which is my main reason for ever even wearing pants.
They trapped his member but maintained the freedom of his testicles. This is the future that liberals want
You assume he still has his testicles…
Not warmth and protection from thorny branches?
I’m not some manly bushman traversing the wilderness on my daily journey to the office. I just don’t want Dorothy from HR on my ass…