I hope it’s better than Civ 6.

    • djsaskdja@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m glad they moved away from unit death stacks in 5 and 6. I think 5 has the best art direction, but 6 is peak gameplay for me.

      • Chailles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Armies in 5 and 6 are kind of underwhelming. Maybe a compromise of having terrain have unit capacities, with various units taking up more space.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yep.

      5 was okay and different, but was definitely the start of the downward spiral.

      4 is the best of what civlization has to offer.

      4 was also great in that it got two expansions

      instead of 150 million tiny DLC for insane prices.

    • silasmariner@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Civ II expansion was peak. I never felt better than the one time I managed to win as humans in the humanity Vs aliens scenario

        • silasmariner@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Apparently I was thinking of ‘Conflicts in Civilization’, which was just a scenario set for the base Civ II game. Tbh I sucked hard at that game back then but in my defence I was too young to really get good strategy and just enjoyed building wonders