Yeah in case you haven’t realised he doesn’t give a fuck about you.
Yeah in case you haven’t realised he doesn’t give a fuck about you.
It’s a big beautiful club and you’re not in it.
People on Lemmy (and the tech community) also skew heavily to tech industries so I’m not surprised they are shocked and disagree that saying you work for Microsoft is a bad thing.
Yes, yes, yes, no.
If your point is that I engage in immoral practices; of course I do.
That wasn’t my initial argument though.
As I have said in another comment, if I worked for Microsoft I wouldn’t wear a shirt complaining about my work killing people in a foreign country because I would realise that makes me a hypocrite.
In the same way I wouldn’t be vegan, work for an abattoir and complain to my CEO that killing animals is wrong.
Is the fact that you’re so defensive over my comment not an indication for you to do a little introspection?
You can’t claim the moral high ground if you’re enabling the very thing you’re complaining about.
I don’t comprehend why people find this controversial other than that they may be uncomfortable with their own choices and dislike when some random on the internet has pointed it out to them.
If I worked for Microsoft I wouldn’t wear a shirt complaining about my work being used to kill kids because I would have the presence of mind to realise that I would be a hypocrite if I did that.
I took the hit to my overall earnings by not working for a corporation that kills the planet/tramples on workers rights/engages in war crimes.
Have you?
Imagine thinking you have any moral high ground but work for a massive corporation.
I’ve already blocked Lemmy world and I’m OOTL what happened now?
Do you really need to read volumes of theory to grasp what is fundamentally a rather straightforward concept?
Leftism shouldn’t be locked behind intellectual elitism.
TL;DR the capitalist state will use threats of violence/actual violence against threats to capitalism which includes those who stand for progressive ideals. Leftists believe this is a justification to use violence against the state.
Mark Zuckerberg is a whiny piss baby.
Not sure I agree as it seems like black and white thinking.
I.e. I could imagine a scenario where someone is very obviously/admits to using neopronouns disingenuously and that would break my social contract with them to honour it.
If I make an assessment of neopronoun usage on a case by case basis I can still avoid witch hunts. It’s similar to how I determine in real life if someone is an asshole or not.
Another way; I can support a person who I genuinely believe uses neopronouns while denouncing and excluding someone who doesn’t.
My preference is for completely community moderated platform.
People essentially vote for content moderation. Likely susceptible to gamification but I’m still interested in seeing it in practice.
Is it still invalidating when someone using neopronouns is doing so disingenuously?
Mods will always be a problem.
I’ve yet to encounter a well adjusted human who voluntarily mods.
And what exactly have leftists become and what do they hate?
This was pretty much what set me on the path to radicalisation.
The system felt so unfair and then to learn that there were people who could do exactly this just because they were born into a family with large capital it was infuriating.
Bully for you.
When I eventually make the switch to Linux your efforts will make it even more seamless.
What’s next for that absolute cesspool?
Looking forward to the next pandemic where vaccines aren’t even developed because the Facebook rabble demands politicians provide us all with crystals and horoscopes instead.
lol you got baited so hard.
Read the full comment before popping off hahahaha
Let’s use healthcare as an example. Liberalism generally believe in the power of the markets so are quite happy to privatise healthcare.
It’s pretty obvious to anyone paying attention that a healthcare system that requires private individuals to pay for coverage will result in the poorest and most unfortunate having no coverage.
The very idea of privatised healthcare being acceptable on any level is antithetical to leftist beliefs but compatible with liberal ideology, hence it is right wing.