unreachable.cloud
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
sanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 15 hours ago

U.S. Citizen Who Deleted Phone’s Data Says His Prosecution Puts Privacy at Risk

www.nytimes.com

external-link
message-square
80
fedilink
421
external-link

U.S. Citizen Who Deleted Phone’s Data Says His Prosecution Puts Privacy at Risk

www.nytimes.com

sanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 15 hours ago
message-square
80
fedilink
nytimes.com
www.nytimes.com
external-link
  • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I think the application of that law depends on whether a seizure is valid (aka legal), which is kind of up in the air, as your video points out.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s legal within most of the US for customs/border enforcement to do warrantless phone searches, because their definition of border is 100 miles from point of entry to the country. So every coastline, every international airport, etc.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’ve heard that is a misunderstanding. It’s 100 miles from a national border or at a point of entry, not 100 miles from any point of entry. It still covers like 50% of the population though.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Maybe so. But probably guessing targeting someone for a warrantless search would not be legal. That is to say, the cops can’t follow a guy and wait until they’re 100 miles from the border to pull them over and call over customs to search them. What may save Turnick is he was already being investigated and this search was clearly an endrun around needing a warrant.

      • boatswain@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        My understanding is that it’s “only” 100 miles from the coast/border, which turns out to be most major population centers.

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yup, because airports

          • boatswain@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            No, what I’m saying is that airports do not count. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_search_exception

            See also the ACLU site: https://www.aclu.org/documents/constitution-100-mile-border-zone

            • frongt@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              This one is more detailed: https://www.aclumaine.org/know-your-rights/100-mile-border-zone/

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s unfortunately a border entry. They can do whatever they want regarding searches in that jurisdiction. He won’t get away with it being an illegal search.

      There are still outs, but they are not super likely :/

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 4.06K users / day
  • 9.56K users / week
  • 16.1K users / month
  • 30.4K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 87.6K subscribers
  • 19.2K Posts
  • 755K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org