• OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I can see a promising market for ‘dumb’ point-and-shoot digital cameras reemerging.

    • Doesn’t automatically upload your pictures to train AI on, no internet-based privacy risks whatsoever

    • No AI nanny telling you that your pictures are too naughty

    • Never needs updates, can never be enshittified by new updates

    • No risk of the government getting their hands on your pictures, unless they physically confiscate the device

    • Can never be hacked without physical access to the camera

    • Doesn’t listen to you or watch you or otherwise spy on you

    • Most models have easy to change user-replaceable batteries

    • Most models are compatible with SD cards for easily upgradeable storage

    • Can take advantage of a larger lens and more adjustable focus/zoom to take better pictures (Even a relatively cheap digital camera could potentially take better pictures than the ultimate flagship phones that cost 4-figures.)

    • bcgm3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      28 minutes ago

      I still use my Canon SD1000. 20 years and it’s still going! The resolution is lower (only 7.1MP), but the photos still look really nice. And that was a relatively cheap camera for the time.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        For now. Until Google says those apps aren’t “verified” or whatever and blacklists them. Until the next Android update makes it scan and upload every photo file anywhere on the device, not just ones used or made in particular apps.

    • Dremor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Yeah, I can tell that since I do tests for Amazon (Amazon Vine).

      There is more and more camera being put to test, ranging for cheap bellow €100 ones to miniaturized keyring sized ones (with tiny screens).
      I tested some of them (and have another one coming next week), the quality of the pictures are good, but the build quality of sub-100 ones are kinda bad (cheap plastics, no optic zoom, no hardpoints for better lenses, sd cards smaller than their advertised size)

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      And that market will destroy itself because “investors” want MRR and so you’ll have to plug your camera into your computer so proprietary software can send the images to the cloud to get “processed” so you can actually view them. You’ll be thankful for the opportunity to pay $9.99USD for that.