• TheMetaleek@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ah yes, the famously human and ethical devs of f2p games, so ethical in fact that some were found in violation of the law in several countries due to their horrendous monetisation schemes, abusing neurological biases to exploit vulnerable individuals, and being all around predatory…

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      I hate how shit gets named.

      Free to apply games are like you said, manipulative and generally whale chasing bastards. They don’t ask for donations, so they don’t fit the meme.

      I think the meme is about free games, funded by donations through patreon or pay what you want pricing that are basically donations at the whim of the players. The ones that don’t have an in game shop and are actually free to play but not F2P.

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s nothing wrong with an in-game shop if it isn’t predatory. For example, this made me think of Rift, where you could fully appreciate the game for free, but quality of life upgrades would cost a few dollars.

        • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Back in my day, the line was cosmetics

          And expansions would add novel content rather than gate content they chopped off of the main game