• Killer57@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 hours ago

    As far as I’m concerned, using AI of any sort inside of a doctor’s office is a grave violation of HIPAA

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Let me tell you about how medical transcriptionists used to do it: Sister in law was one, she didn’t seem to care about HIPAA too much, she and all her colleagues did lose their jobs about a 15-20 years ago when AI transcription software took over their jobs, but before that she was frequently given jobs because her predecessors made serious mistakes in their transcriptions.

      • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        If she didn’t care about HIPAA, I’m glad she lost the job lol.

        If only we could fire AI too.

      • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 minutes ago

        Yeah? Watch me.

        Watch me and millions like me push back everywhere and slowly change the world.

      • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Speech-to-text (a type of AI) has been around for a fair good years, but now they’re being paired with generative AI. This is the kind of thing that shouldn’t be paired with a generative LLM. A language model to identify words? Yes. Generative? No.

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          53 minutes ago

          Yes. It technically does improve accuracy (homophone correction, for example) but the occasional errors are worse and way less obvious.