• zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    30 minutes ago

    I’ll be that guy. No headphone jack, no sale. As others have said, I’d love GrapheneOS as well, but I know why that isn’t in the cards.

    • QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      Is it not worth repairablity and potential headphone jack upgrades? Their pr is really moving quick now… 🤔

        • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          44 minutes ago

          It wasn’t just the update cycle either, it’s that they don’t have the physical hardware chips to support Graphene’s minimum requirements for security, which would severely weaken any benefits you actually get from GrapheneOS.

            • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 minutes ago

              Entirely lacking disk encryption for typical users due to not having a secure element is a pretty major flaw.

              It’s also missing hardware accelerated virtualization which is necessary for much of GrapheneOS’s sandboxing, has weak security for other keys in the OS keystore, is missing hardware memory tagging which makes it much easier for apps to use overflow attacks, doesn’t have proper verified boot support once a custom alternative OS is flashed, and leaves exposed debugging APIs even when the phone is locked.

              This breaks:

              • Secure app spawning
              • Memory corruption protection
              • Integer overflow protection
              • Most of Graphene’s kernel hardening
              • Much of Graphene’s attack surface reduction abilities
              • Hardware-based attestation and security monitoring
              • Quick tile protection pre-unlock
              • Debugging access prevention
              • Verified Boot
              • The security of your PIN against any automated attack

              At that point, GrapheneOS can’t physically provide you essentially any security anymore.

      • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I haven’t heard of this. Looking into it there’s at least a year wait. I’d consider it - though my Edge 2022 battery may not make it until then. Damn thing was crap from day 1.

        • lokalhorst@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 minutes ago

          I am pretty sure Motorola plans to sell flag ship devices with GrapheneOS preinstalled. They won’t support old devices. Also the manufacturer needs to still ship firmware updates for a specific duration for GrapheneOS to support it.

  • uuj8za@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Cool! I bought mine through Clove several months ago. This is great news! The Fairphone 6 is a pretty good phone. I’m happy with it.

    The power button + volume buttons are in the perfect place… for accidentally taking screenshots!!! :( That’s the one thing I don’t like, but everything else is good.

    Oh, and I wish I could use either SailfishOS or at least Graphene. But, still. I don’t miss my old Pixel.

  • Schwim Dandy@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This is incredibly exciting news. It will hopefully be quite some time before I need a new phone but I’ve always wanted the option of this brand when I finally do.

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That’s exciting. Does anyone know how /e/os compare to stock android or graphene? And should we be worried about Murena messing it up, or is it a solid company?

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’ve been using the Murena fairphone for about 8 months now. Has its ups and downs, it uses microG to simulate play services. Most things work except for my Samsung watch and the wallet. Feel free to send questions my way

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Cool, any issues with annoying apps like banks requiring play protect or something? Is there an Android auto equivalent or an emulation to allow use in a car?

  • pasdechance@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Cool. But, which repair centre has the contract for bricked phones. In Europe only one place has the vendor key thing if you fuck up while flashing the device, they won’t let users or other repair places have it so I assume it works the same in the US.

    If I needed a new phone, I might get one of these. Repairable phones are cool.

    • jumperalex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      There is Verizon service, you have to buy from the US store. But then it is Android and not /e/OS … it took me a while and a fair number of AI tokens to full figure that out.

      trl;dr it is a hardware cert problem why the EU version is T-Mobile and the US is VZW/ATT. I still couldn’t figure out why the US-VZW/ATT version can’t have /e/OS but it still smelled like obtaining certification is the problem and there doesn’t appear to be any public statements on a timeline for it.

      If you want privacy, buy a pixel and flash GrapheneOS.

      If you want modularity/repairability buy a Fairphone.

      • If you want modularity/repairability and privacy, buy an /e/OS Fairphone from the EU store but accept only T-Mobile
      • If you want modularity/repairability and ATT/VZW, buy a Fairphone from the US store but accept no extra privacy
      • If you want it all, guess we gotta wait.
        • jumperalex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yes you can put whatever COMPATIBLE OS you want on it. Sadly GrapheneOS isn’t one of them. But again, you’re not wrong. I was just highlighting what I found about the options and their trade-offs.

  • stenAanden@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Ha. Most of the fairphone community is pretty meh about it.

    I have one though and my biggest complaing is lack of the national payment app.

  • Staff@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    €600 is the minimum for a Fairphone. A new cheap one by a major brand would be €150.

    I’d definitely like some privacy on my phone but damn.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s 150 because they’re subsidizing the phone so you’ll pay for service, addons, and so they can sell your data and bloatware. Fairphone isn’t expensive, the other phone is artificially cheap.

      • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        42 minutes ago

        They’re kinda comparing apples and oranges, fairphone doesn’t really have a budget phone.

        They just have one model, which they gradually upgrade the hardware of and gives a new number.

        Right now there’s barely any sellers of a Fairphone 4 as an example, and you’re able to get it for ~400 euroes from refurbished condition sellers.

        Most brands, continues to sell old models. Which ends up as the budget phone 3 generations down the line. But fairphone doesn’t, they only sell a fairly powerful phone from new condition.

      • Staff@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        You’re right. They do get us with all the bloatware and other nefarious stuff. Time to start saving.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s the cheapest they have, but not really a cheap model. Those are pretty decent specs for the price. Unfortunately I don’t know any smartphone selling for under 200$/€ that doesn’t suck.

      • Staff@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Unfortunately I don’t know any smartphone selling for under 200$/€ that doesn’t suck.

        Tbh, I was going with prices from years ago when I bought mine. It cost me €150 and still runs today’s apps and the battery lasts a day. Problem is no more updates from the vendor (and lack of privacy of course).