I’ve read it (from here: https://archive.ph/ci9vj#selection-591.0-859.53 because I don’t want to give them the clicks). And? I agree with @[email protected] , it smells like an advertisement. In fact, it doesn’t just smells, it practically screams like corporate propaganda.
If the headline looks like an ad I’m not going to waste time reading the article. As much as I too don’t like discussing an article without actually reading it I do have to decide if I want to spend my time reading it. Basically I think the title is bad and if that’s not what the article is saying they should change the title. Could’ve been something like “Take-Two CEO Admits GTA 6 Could Have Cost More Than $80, but Rockstar Chose Restraint and Hopes To Overdeliver On Value”. Make it seem like it isn’t set in stone that GTA 6 is more valuable than the price.
Really shows that people don’t read past the headline.
I’ve read it (from here: https://archive.ph/ci9vj#selection-591.0-859.53 because I don’t want to give them the clicks). And? I agree with @[email protected] , it smells like an advertisement. In fact, it doesn’t just smells, it practically screams like corporate propaganda.
If the headline looks like an ad I’m not going to waste time reading the article. As much as I too don’t like discussing an article without actually reading it I do have to decide if I want to spend my time reading it. Basically I think the title is bad and if that’s not what the article is saying they should change the title. Could’ve been something like “Take-Two CEO Admits GTA 6 Could Have Cost More Than $80, but Rockstar Chose Restraint and Hopes To Overdeliver On Value”. Make it seem like it isn’t set in stone that GTA 6 is more valuable than the price.