FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoWhy Normal People Aren’t Using AI Agentswww.wired.comexternal-linkmessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up1240arrow-down113
arrow-up1227arrow-down1external-linkWhy Normal People Aren’t Using AI Agentswww.wired.comFoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square109fedilink
minus-squareParlimentOfDoom@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·16 hours ago half the time Who said all the time? The problem is most people can’t tell which half it’s fucking up. An unreliable tool isn’t useful
minus-squareFranconian_Nomad@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·15 hours agoHmm. They fuck up 50 percent of the time? I not only doubt that, I know that this is wrong. No offense. Do you actively use LMMs?
minus-squareParlimentOfDoom@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 hours agoNo. Because they fuck up so often. Why would I keep using a broken tool?
minus-squareFranconian_Nomad@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·6 hours agoGotcha. You‘re one of those guys talking out of their arse.
minus-squareParlimentOfDoom@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoNope. Just experienced enough to know when the tool is wrong, so I understand it’s a fuck up.
Who said all the time? The problem is most people can’t tell which half it’s fucking up. An unreliable tool isn’t useful
Hmm. They fuck up 50 percent of the time? I not only doubt that, I know that this is wrong. No offense. Do you actively use LMMs?
No. Because they fuck up so often.
Why would I keep using a broken tool?
Gotcha. You‘re one of those guys talking out of their arse.
Nope. Just experienced enough to know when the tool is wrong, so I understand it’s a fuck up.