• ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m not sure what other system is even conceivably possible in the general case. There’s no straightforward universal relationship between tariffs paid by businesses and prices paid by the customers of those businesses.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      I think the best system would be not to allow tariffs to be illegally implemented in the first place. But I realize that’s asking a lot.

      • DuncanTheDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 minutes ago

        I dream of having a functional government. I know everywhere has issues, but rule by EO from a wannabe dictator is tiring.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Take the total tariff income, divide it by the number of people in the country, and send out the checks.

      It’s the ONLY legitimate way to handle it.

    • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There were some businesses passing the fees on directly to the end consumer via tariff implementation fees, but unless you have something like that itemized on an invoice, I believe you would be correct.

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        A business that passed 100% of the tariffs on to consumers via higher prices could still be worse off after getting a refund than it would have been if there never had been tariffs, if demand is elastic enough, so I’m not sure even that sort of data could resolve the question of who deserves what.