• chaogomu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 hours ago

    No, the added costs have little benefit.

    College itself is great. The added costs have not added to the experience.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The costs aren’t really what’s changed. It’s who bares the costs. Teaching a student today isn’t materially more expensive than it was 30 years ago. We’ve just shifted the demand for school revenues from state budgets to family pocketbooks as the number of students entering college has swelled.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Teaching a student today isn’t materially more expensive than it was 30 years ago.

        Well, it kind of is, though. Just look at the massively bloated administration budgets/staff.

        • Mirshe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Don’t forget college sports. If your parents are early Gen X or Boomers, college sports weren’t quite as big a deal - they weren’t quite as commercialized until the mid-80s, which started salaries for coaches and staff flying.

          In many states, the highest paid public employee is a college football coach.