Sixty minutes. That’s how long it took for a private Snapchat message to travel from Kristen Volpe’s phone to the FBI to the deputies standing in her elementary school hallway. On January 29, 2025, the 22-year-old student teacher at John L. Hensey Elementary in Washington, Illinois, vented to her boyfriend and two roommates — three people total — after a student closed her laptop mid-class and wiped her lesson plan. She referenced shooting the student or the school. She meant it as a frustrated joke. Snapchat’s algorithm didn’t get the humor.

No student reported her. No parent. No coworker. The flag was entirely automated. Snapchat’s policy permits voluntary emergency disclosures to law enforcement — no warrant required — when the platform determines imminent harm exists. The algorithm makes that initial call. Think of it like your Ring doorbell deciding to call 911 on its own, except the doorbell is reading your text messages.

  • Ironrod@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Christ, are we meant to feel sorry for someone who joked about shooting children now? It’s a big enough problem in the US, normalising it is not the way to go

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Were not meant to feel sorry for this person.

      This is not an emotion triggering article. Its a n information warning.

      The apps some use to send private messages can call the cops on you if an ai gets context wrong. Kinda a big deal.

    • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, we absolutely fucking are.

      You know who we’re not supposed to feel any empathy at all for?

      People dense enough to not understand the difference between a joke a frustrated person made in the moment to intimate friends vs a scripted joke a comedian tells on stage or on TV, and how different those things are in relation to “normalizing” anything.

      • Ironrod@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh, I definitely get it but she had means, motive and opportunity to follow through which I think is a little different. Also unless I missed it the article doesn’t state what she actually said so people pieing it off as a joke are ridiculous.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They joked to a few very close friends who knew it was a dark joke after a rough day. It had no business going beyond that.

      • Ironrod@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh, they knew it was a dark joke and not a legitimate threat? How? The article doesn’t actually quote her

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Because they’re her friends, and know her, just like I know the people around me would never do that, and if MAGA arrested one of them, I’d KNOW the problem was MAGA, not my friend.