• Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    “I’m not a Luddite, you’re a loser!” Nice. You sure showed him that your critical analysis skills are superior. If you’re not a Luddite, then why do you see yourself in that comment? You’re self-identifying at this point.

    • webadict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      “Mooooooom. This guy called me Luddite on the internet again!!!”

      I hope you are happy now, she is literally crying.

      Anyway, is that all? I expected that your LLM would come up with refutations 20 times faster and yet I am sitting here waiting for why I’m wrong. Would you like to criticize my gas-guzzling vehicle next while you defend billion dollar AI industries on why global warming is the consumers’ fault? Perhaps that will defend your planet-destroying behavior.

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        If cogsuckers knew what words meant they wouldn’t need their clanker overlords to tell them what to think.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        luddite doesn’t mean against all technological advancement, it’s a humanist stance on the ethical use of technology,

        it does not - lets not rewrite history here. Luddites failed because destroying stuff doesn’t really work and that’s the lesson we should take. It’s easy to complain and break things but that doesn’t help anyone, real value comes from real efforts and real visions.