• Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    My biggest problem with Arch over the last 3 years (after skill issues, of course) has been the roughly 2 days when some lib package was rewritten in Rust, breaking a bunch of depancies, so i had to rely on a flatpak.

    My biggest problem with Ubuntu has been the 2 or 3 times Canonical decided to uninstall my wifi drivers on my headless server or obliterate my kernel or just decide randomly to never update a package again (even though theyve shipped said updates)

    My issues with Arch have always been solvable in under and hour or my fault. My issues with Debian (specifically ubuntu) have been catastrophic.

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Well there’s your problem. Ubuntu is based on Debian, but it differs in quite a lot of ways. Especially if you use Ubuntu’s 6-monthly releases.

      • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Ubuntu is based on Debian, but it differs in quite a lot of ways.

        Probably, they didn’t use dkms to install their custom wifi driver. If that was the case, Debian and Ubuntu behave identically and the driver isn’t added if a newer updated kernel is installed.

        Especially if you use Ubuntu’s 6-monthly releases.

        If their driver was included in a user PPA, it’s gone after a Ubuntu release upgrade and the sources.list of the PPA is deleted.

          • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I may be wrong in that point.
            However, the point I wanted to make is; all third party packages are uninstalled so reinstalling them without internet connection is quite challenging.